Background Image
Previous Page  22 / 296 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 296 Next Page
Page Background

Guba, April-May 1918. Documented Pogroms of the Muslims

20

Guba’s major landlords and former Russian Army captain, was ap-

pointed the Uyezd Commissar by

OZACOM

. (23)

In the meantime,

the Soviet of Soldier Deputies

was founded in

Guba-based military units, followed by the

Soviet of Worker Deputies

in mid-March 1917 dominated by the

Essers

(Socialist Revolutiona-

ries), the

Mensheviks

and bourgeois nationalists. (24) Thus the diarchy

power was also featuring the situation in Guba Uyezd.

The Bolsheviks

, anxious about existing situation, were trying to

increase their influence basically among the soldiers of military units

deployed in Guba and Gusar, as well as in the workers’ dominated

areas. This was the way they succeeded in forming cells among rail-

road workers at Khachmaz and Davachi stations. (25)

In the meantime, the Uyezd’s Azerbaijani population was get-

ting increasingly active as well, with branches of

Mussavat

National

Democratic Party established by local intellectuals. Habilgasym Rous-

tamov was the founder of the

Mussavat’s

branch in Guba, whereas

Alipanahbey Sherifbeyov, a representative of one of Guba’s high-born

landlord families, was the deputy chief of the local committee. (26)

In July 1917, outlets of the party emerged in Davachi, Galagah vil-

lage of Davachi Precinct and other places. (27) Subsequently, branch

of

Ittihad

religious party was established in Guba by Alibey Zizikski,

Hamdulla Effendi Effendizadeh and other recognized representatives

of local elite. (28)

Besides this, Muslim National Committees started emerging in

Guba as of May 1917 to include mainly representatives of landlords,

merchants and clergy. (29)

That being said, none of the newly-emerging power structures

was capable of reforming existing agrarian relations, the core factor

determining social and political stability for decades not only in Guba

Uyezd, but elsewhere in Azerbaijan or the whole of South Caucasus.

Nonetheless, compared to other places, particularly Elisavetpol and

Gazakh Uyezds then overtaken by peasant unrest, the situation in

both the town of Guba and the rest of the Uyezd was generally under

control, and cases of peasant attacks on landlord mansions and farm-

steads very seldom.

It should be also noted that local

beys

, landlords, bureaucrats

and intelligentsia, sufficiently represented in the local authorities,

subordinate first to

OZAKOM

and then to the Trans-Caucasian Com-